originally appeared in the San Francisco Examiner from Reuters:
Wells
Fargo has agreed to pay $175 million to resolve allegations that the
financial institution discriminated against qualified black and Hispanic
borrowers in its mortgage lending according to the U.S. Justice
Department.
In the second-largest settlement of its kind, the
biggest U.S. mortgage lender will pay $125 million to borrowers who were
allegedly steered into higher-priced subprime loans or who paid higher
fees and rates than white borrowers.
Wells Fargo also will
contribute $50 million to homebuyer assistance programs in eight
metropolitan areas around the country. The government identified those
areas as needing the most help in recovering from the housing crisis.
The
settlement, which needs approval from a judge, would end the
investigation into whether the fourth-largest U.S. bank knowingly
targeted minorities between 2004 and 2009 for risky mortgages that came
with higher costs, according to documents filed in the U.S. District
Court for the District of Columbia.
The U.S. assistant
attorney general for civil rights, said at a news conference in
Washington, D.C. that this a case about real people, African-American
and Latino, who
suffered real harm as a result of Wells Fargo’s discriminatory lending
practices, people with similar qualifications should be treated
similarly. They should be judged by the content of their credit
worthiness and not the color of their skin.
The government
investigation found that loans submitted to Wells Fargo by mortgage
brokers had varied interest rates, fees and costs based only on race and
not correlated to the borrowers’ creditworthiness, according to the
court document.
The Obama administration has mounted a campaign
to closely monitor banks in order to ensure loan discrimination
practices that were a part of the housing bust and led to record
defaults are eliminated. Bank of America’s Countrywide Financial unit
agreed in December to pay a record $335 million to settle similar
charges.
Wells Fargo said it was settling the matter solely for
the purpose of avoiding contested litigation with the U.S. Justice
Department. In the consent order with the government, Wells asserted it
treated all its customers fairly and without regard to race and national
origin.
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage president said in a statement
that he believes it is in the best interest of our team members,
customers, communities and investors to avoid a long and costly legal
fight, and to instead devote our resources to continuing to contribute
to the country’s housing recovery.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I think offering an extended warranty is pretty common practice. I never used mine, but it is nice knowing that if I needed it, it will be always there.
AMT Warranty
Post a Comment